The Front Range Tornado
May 7-8 1965
rough draft form
Jonathan D. Finch
Back to Boulder Area Tornadoes Webpage
Back to Albuquerque Area Tornadoes Webpage
Back to Pueblo Area Tornadoes Webpage
Back to Cheyenne Area Tornadoes Webpage
Overview
On May 7, 1965 around 10 pm, a thunderstorm developed near Boulder, Colorado. This storm moved north-northeast
and became severe, producing tornado(es) and
large hail from just northeast of Fort Collins to near Cheyenne,
Wyomimg.
The cloud to ground lightning strikes with this
storm could be seen from Denver
(starting at 10 pm). Most tornadoes in
this part of the country occur later in the
spring and summer. Also, this severe weather occurred late at night,
which is
extremely rare for the front range. Greater than
golfball sized hail broke out house windows southeast of Cheyenne.
This event was a precursor to a major tornado
outbreak in Nebraska and South Dakota later on May 8, 1965.
Meteorological Discussion
The 21 UTC May 7 1965 surface map shows a warm front from southeast Colorado into northwest Kansas and then a
stationary boundary extending into Minnesota. A
dryline extended south from the front into west Texas. By 00 UTC, this
boundary was north of Lamar and La Junta. An area of
thunderstorms developed across northern and northwest Kansas
and produced copious amounts of cool outflow. This
outflow surged to the west-northwest through the evening hours and
carried moisture-laden air all the way back to
the front range of north central Colorado. This outflow can be seen in
the
surface observations from Goodland and McCook.
The 00 UTC upper air charts showed a very impressive
upper level storm system over the southwest US. 500mb, 400mb,
300mb temperatures were fairly cool (-17C, -29C and -42C along the front range). By 12 UTC May 8 1965(5 hours after
the tornado), this system was a little further east.
500mb, 400mb, 300mb temperatures were around -19C, -30C, -43C.
Therefore, only slight mid to high level cooling
occurred from 00 to 06 UTC. 700mb temperatures in the areas of
interest
were
around 6C at 00 UTC and down to around -3C by 12 UTC. By 03 UTC, the dewpoint at Limon, CO was 47F and
from 03 UTC to 04 UTC to 05 UTC the dewpoint at Akron, CO jumped from 40F to 49F to 51F. I had a difficult time
analyzing the fronts in Colorado. By 05 UTC, Akron,
CO appears to be in or close to the true warm sector since the
surface theta-e met or exceeded warm sector theta-e values in northeast Kansas.
I constructed an approximate sounding for the
tornado affected area. The elevation of the tornado varied from 5600ft
to
6100ft with an average surface pressure of 808mb. I
came up with several possibilities of surface bases CAPE based
on best case, average case and worst case
scenarios. The surface based CAPE likely ranged from 1000-1600
j/kg.
So how
did I arrive at these soundings? Well, the 500-300mb temperatures did
not vary much from 00 UTC to 12 UTC
(there
was a slght cooling at 500mb) and the Denver soundings were not
contaminated. I took an average of the 500mb
temperatures at 00 and 12 UTC (-18C). The 700mb
temperature was about +6C at 00Z and then dropped -3C by 12 UTC.
I estimated the 700mb temp. to be around +3C. I also
reasoned that the low level air over Limon and Akron had time to
advect back to the front range(northeast of Fort
Collins) by 06 UTC. However, upslope cooling from Akron
(4700ft or
845mb) to Nunn, CO(5600ft or 818mb) and areas
southeast of Cheyenne(6100ft or 800mb) would result in 5-6F
cooling.
I also allowed for a cooler airmass along the
immediate front range (3F). Using upslope and some cooling along
the front
range I came up with 61 - 9 = 52F. The
dewpoint was 47F at Limon at 03 UTC and between 49 and 51 at Akron
from 4
to 6 UTC. Since the dewpoint lapse rate(
assuming conservation of mixing ratio) is 1F/1000ft, I allowed for a 1F
drop in
dewpoint. I also lowered the dewpoint another
2F (from 50F at Akron) to arrive at a 47F dewpoint for my medium
case
scenario. For the worst case scenario, I
lowered the temperature an additional 2F and the dewpoint 1F.
One commonly misunderstood concepts in meteorology
is elevated heating and its affect on theta-e. Dewpoints on the high
plains and front range are typically lower than on
the low plains. However, we all know that severe thunderstorms and even
significant tornadoes occur on the high plains
and front range. These often hit nothing, but they can still be very
powerful.
At 03 UTC, the T/TD at Limon, CO and Topeka, KS were
62F/47F and 75F/61F respectively. Even though the T/TD
were 13F/14F lower at Limon than at Topeka, the
theta-e was about the same at the 2 locations(only very slightly lower
at
Limon). The mixing ratio at Topeka was 42% higher
than at Limon. Actually a 47F dewpoint at Limon has the same
moisture
as a 52F dewpoint at Topeka. So if one normalizes
for sea level, the dewpoint was only about 9F higher at Topeka instead
of 14F. However, one can easily see that the higher
potential temperature at Limon (92.4F) compensated for the lack of
moisture to yield a similar theta-e. Even though the
actual temperature 13F lower at Limon, the potential temperature
at Limon was 14F higher!!
03 UTC |
Elev(ft) |
Pres.(mb) |
SLP(mb) |
T(F) |
Td(F) |
MR(g/kg) |
theta(F) |
theta-e(K) |
Limon, CO |
5500 |
820 |
997 |
62
|
47 |
8.4 |
92.4 |
332.5
|
Topeka |
880 |
978 |
1009.8 |
75 |
61 |
11.9 |
78.4 |
333.7
|
At 05 UTC the theta-e at Akron, CO was almost as high as Topeka.
05 UTC |
Elev(ft) |
Pres.(mb) |
SLP(mb) |
T(F) |
Td(F) |
MR(g/kg) |
theta(F) |
theta-e(K) |
Akron, CO |
4700 |
845 |
1000.1 |
61
|
51 |
9.5 |
86.6 |
332.1
|
Topeka |
880 |
978 |
1009.9 |
74 |
61 |
11.9 |
75.4 |
333.1
|
By 07 UTC
(around the time the tornado was south of Cheyenne), the T/TD were 11F/7F lower at Akron
than
Topeka. However the 54F dewpoint at Akron is
about the same as a 58F
dewpoint at Topeka. So in real terms the
dewpoint was only 3F lower at Akron. Even
though the temperature was
9F lower at Akron, the potential temperature
was 11F higher. The theta-e was actually higher
at Akron at Topeka.
07 UTC |
Elev(ft) |
Pres.(mb) |
SLP(mb) |
T(F) |
Td(F) |
MR(g/kg) |
theta(F) |
theta-e(K) |
Akron, CO |
4700 |
845 |
998.7 |
63
|
54 |
10.6 |
86.7 |
335.4
|
Topeka |
880 |
978 |
1009.4 |
72 |
61 |
11.9 |
75.4 |
331.8
|
The observations from Cheyenne are VERY interesting.