Historical Tornado Cases for North America
Jonathan
D. Finch
1936-1949
1950-1959
1960-1969
1970-1984
1985-2004
Tornado case study pages by National Weather Service Forecast Areas
As the following pages are
updated, the above pages that are based on a range of years will
gradually become obselete. I am
growing weary of constantly updating both.
Saint Louis
Norman
Lubbock
Amarillo
Dodge City
Cheyenne
North Platte
Topeka
Boulder
Wichita
Goodland
Pueblo
Albuquerque
Hastings
Tulsa
Des Moines
Omaha
Minneapolis
Grand Forks
Birmingham and Huntsville
The goal is to provide an archive of surface/upper
air charts and soundings for many United States tornado
events. The data were
plotted using digital
atmosphere and then hand analyzed using Microsoft Paint. Just click
on the date to get
event details.
Tornado paths and
hail occurrences are plotted using SeverePlot
v2.0 by John Hart of the Storm
Prediction Center.
Most of
the details were obtained from the book 'Significant Tornadoes'
by Tom Grazulis. This book is a fantastic resource for tornado
enthusiasts. In the near future I plan to include plots of CAPE. For
tornado cases, I prefer surface based CAPE because there is no
way of knowing the vertical distribution of moisture in the boundary
layer without a dense sounding network. Digital Atmosphere will
soon be able to calculate CAPE fields.
Great effort was taken to utilize all available data for these plots.
This is not an automated process. The surface data on the surface
charts below were coded manually in METAR format by the author of this
webpage. This is really the only way to get a good handle
on the severe weather
environment. Recently, I have obtained surface date(1978-current) on cd
from weathergrapics.
This makes the process
much faster since I don't have to code the metars by hand. A few
observations were missing from this
database so these were still coded by hand.
CAPE varies greatly in time and
space and using only the 1st order stations does not suffice For
example, there are no 1st order
stations in eastern CO. A narrow CAPE
axis in the traditional upslope corridor from southwest NE
into northeast Colorado and
the southern NE panhandle will never be
sampled using only the 1st order stations. Surface data from
the
High Plains
Regional Climate Center, University of Nebraska, Lincoln and CoAGMET
data were used for some of the post
1980 cases in the plains. The surface winds are in knots at most stations
after 1955 and mainly in mph before 1955.
I am making an effort to generate approximate soundings for some cases.
This is fairly easy in summer and for cases where data
are plentiful. The task becomes nearly impossible in data void regions
and in winter when CAPE changes rapidly in time
and space. Unfortunately the placement of weather observation sites
is completely tied to aviation.
Tornadoes have less to hit on the high plains and front range, and they
generally move slower(thus have a shorter path length).
They generally occur during daylight hours with no trees to block visual
sighting. Higher cloud bases and flat terrain also help in the
sighting of these tornadoes.The population density is very low on the
high plains. Any humans in the way of these beasts generally
have time to get out of the way. Therefore, tornadoes in this region
will hit few structures and kill very few people. This does not mean
these are weaker tornadoes. In fact, some tornadoes that are rated
F0
to F2 above 3000ft would do F3 to F5 damage when
moving 45-60 mph across Mississippi at 2am.
I have begun approximating instability for the cases below.
While surface based CAPE is used widely these days, calculating CAPE
from surface and upper air data
can be a very labor intensive process. Until the process for computing
CAPE becomes automated
using digital
atmosphere , I will approximate instability using the surface based lifted index. For stations above 5000ft., I may use
the 400mb lifted index. I do not like using mean layer instability for
surface based convection. While mean layer LI may be more
realistic, I would rather stick with values that we know are correct
using surface data. We really have no idea what the t/td profiles
are above the surface. In well mixed situations, the pot. temp and
mixing ratios are often conserved in the boundary layer, so using
mean layer LI wouldn't really do any good anyway. The low level
vertical distribution of moisture varies greatly in time and space.
In case you are skeptical, just
study the August 6, 1962 soundings across the plains from 12 UTC to 00
UTC. Moisture generally
pools in areas of convergence
where storms often initiate. Using soundings 50-100 km or more away
would be very misleading.
Good proximity soundings are hard
to come by, especially in the cool season when theta-e varies greatly
in time and space.
In most cases, many soundings
were considered, along with the appropriate surface data and elevation
to calculate instability.
In other words, surface and upper
air data were judiciously utilized to approximate instability.
The technique I used to approximate the lifted index without the
virtual temperature correction is very simple. I took full advantage
of surface observations in the inflow of the tornadic activity just
prior or during the time of the tornadoes. I looked up the station
pressure on the observation
forms, as well as the T/TD. Then I approximated the 500mb temperature
on the 500mb chart using the
morning and evening data. Then I found a sounding on awips that had
nearly the same surface pressure(station pressure). I modified
the surface T/TD and 500mb temperature and found the lifted index.